Negative rates, a tiered system and the ECB

February 24, 2016

Lasse Holboell Nielsen, Research Analyst at Goldman Sachs, suggests that the prospect of further cuts in central bank policy resulting in rates going deeper into negative territory has had an adverse impact on investor confidence in banks.

Key Quotes

“We (and the market) do expect further policy rate cuts, notably n by the ECB in March.

An adverse investor response towards the impact of such policy easing on European banks may reduce the effectiveness of the rate cut in stimulating demand (and ultimately in achieving the ECB’s price stability objective).

While at this point we do not expect the ECB to introduce an expanded ‘two-tier’ system to remunerate excess reserves in March, such an approach is feasible – indeed likely – in the future, should further cuts be deemed necessary and as a way of reducing investor concerns about bank profitability. (Our current forecast does not envisage that such cuts will be necessary.) An indication in March that a tiered system is under consideration would signal that further rate cuts are possible (which would weigh on the currency) and reassure investors about bank earnings (easing pressures on market funding costs for banks).

We still view the limit on how negative rates can go as determined by the ‘cash arbitrage’ constraint (i.e., the incentive for banks to store physical banknotes at zero return rather than hold excess reserves at the central bank with a negative return). We have previously argued that this implies a constraint on rates closer to -0.50% than -5%. We maintain this view (although regulatory interventions to prevent financial institutions stockpiling banknotes would influence our assessment).

Bank profitability concerns, even if reduced by a tiered system, may mean the ECB is less willing to cut as deep as the cash arbitrage constraint may allow (which the Danish and Swiss cases show is at least -0.75%). At this stage, we see an ECB rate much lower than -0.75% as relatively unlikely.

Looking at the pass-through of past ECB cuts into negative territory, there has been a meaningful decline in household and non-financial corporate deposit rates at banks, particularly for term deposits. But retail bank deposits have nevertheless remained non-negative (and retail deposits likely remain more sensitive to negative rates while bank and large corporate deposits can more easily be affected by regulation and moral suasion from the authorities).

We see a case for further ECB cuts, within a tiered system, which allows for a steeping of the yield curve (for a given level of average interest rates), as a way to boost banks’ profitability, improve the availability of bank credit and stimulate economic growth.

We have less sympathy for the argument that negative rates per se reduce the incentive for banks to lend to the real economy. Rather, we see negative sentiment towards banks driven by non-fundamental factors (such as an excessive fear of negative rates) and a very flat yield curve (induced by asset purchases) as the key concern for bank profitability and the banking sector’s willingness to support the real economy in Europe.”

Publication source
OctaFX information  OctaFX reviews

September 26, 2016
The aftershocks of FOMC
The FED did not raise interest rates last week, as it was anticipated by many market participants. It seems like the FED decided to go with status quo and wait until a new American president is elected. We are waiting for a rate hike to take a place in December as it would be logical and a well justified thing to happen...
September 26, 2016
The week ahead: Focus shifts from central banks to politics
Monday’s US presidential debate will probably break a new record, not in the S&P 500, but the number of viewers which according to media analyst could reach over 100 million Americans, surpassing Carter-Reagan debate in 1980 which attracted 80.6 million viewers...
September 23, 2016
Risk rating
The market is in need of a new narrative. The Fed meeting in December is too far off and for now, the US election is not something that entices excitement. With central banks on hold, markets are pushing the envelope in terms of risk...

Orbex Rating
Grand Capital Rating
Tickmill Rating
Fort Financial Services Rating
OctaFX Rating
FXTM Rating

Binary Brokerz Rating
TopOption Rating
OptionFair Rating
365BinaryOption Rating
Porter Finance Rating
OptionsXO Rating