HFM information and reviews
HFM
96%
Octa information and reviews
Octa
94%
FXCC information and reviews
FXCC
92%
FxPro information and reviews
FxPro
89%
FBS information and reviews
FBS
88%
Vantage information and reviews
Vantage
85%

How to avoid analysts' mistakes?


We often hear about an undervalued asset, an unfair exchange rate, or an overvalued dividend forecast. In my opinion, such "expert" statements can not be trusted, but serve as a sign of speaker’s ignorance. In such case, the person puts his opinion above the market's efficiency, although often such radical forecasts are carried out simply by virtue of the theory of probability.

Many are confused, so I’ll briefly remind you that "market efficiency" is understood as its ability to reach a fair price of an asset at any given time. This does not mean at all that an "efficient market" should effectively bring in money to investors and managers, although such a bundle can often be heard from analysts.

Arguing to their trading ideas, very often for the sake of wit, "experts" throw quotes from behavioral finance theories and effective market analysis into a discussion. They sound convincing, but as a rule, it does not indicate in any way that it is reasonable to accept these ideas. It is important to understand the terms here, and you will be able to find similar, sometimes funny, errors in analytical reviews.

The essay below briefly explains the essence of these two theories. From myself I will add that I have always believed that it is only the market which is always right. It is made by people and the robots created by them, and it is the diversity of their opinions and strategies that makes it possible to adequately evaluate this or that tool. Good luck!

A game for fools?


Of course, behavioral finance experts recognize the role of diversity in pricing. Here is what Andrei Shleifer writes in his remarkable book "Inefficient Markets: An Introduction to Behavioral Finance":

The hypothesis of an effective market is not confirmed and is not refuted by the assumption of investor rationality. Many models based on the irrational behavior of some investors, nevertheless, predict efficient markets. The argument is usually given the case when irrational investors in the market trade as necessary. If there are a lot of such investors and if their trading strategies do not correlate with each other, their transactions will neutralize each other. As a result, in such a market ... prices will be close to the base value.

The problem is that in behavioral finance, a variety of investors is seen as the exception rather than the rule. Shleifer continues:

"This argument relies mainly on the lack of correlation of strategies among irrational investors and therefore applies to a rather narrow circle."

Finally, Shleifer argues that arbitration - another mechanism that brings prices into line with fundamental value - is risky, so the possibilities for arbitration are in reality limited.

Thus, Shleifer makes the following conclusions: since investors are irrational, and their strategies are more often correlated than not, markets are inefficient. In addition, arbitration may not always make the market efficient. Therefore, market inefficiency is the rule, and efficiency is the exception. And active portfolio management in a fundamentally inefficient market is a game for fools.

We believe that the majority of professional market participants believe exactly the opposite: market efficiency is the rule, and inefficiency - the exception. After all, we see how, in many complex systems, diverse decisions and actions of individuals create rational outcomes. The team invariably replays the average individual. An investor ecosystem on the market is usually sufficient to ensure that there is no systematic way to replay the market. Thus, diversity is assumed to be the default, and loss of diversity is always a notable (and potentially profitable) exception.

See money, imitate money.


If diversity generates an efficient market, then the loss of diversity makes the markets prone to inefficiency. In short, if you turn to behavioral finance as a tool for finding investment opportunities, then look for them at the collective level.

A good example is the herd when a large group of investors perform the same actions on the basis of observing others, regardless of their individual knowledge. From time to time in the markets there are periods when any one mood begins to dominate. Such a loss of diversity usually leads to a market boom (everyone becomes bull) or sharp falls (everyone becomes bear).

As far as I know, there is no tool that would accurately and consistently measure the level of diversity in the market. Good hints can give an objective assessment of publicly expressed in the media and private opinions. The key to successful counter investing is to focus on the behavior and mistakes of the crowd, not its individual members.

Author: Kate Solano, Forex-Ratings.com

Share: Tweet this or Share on Facebook


Related

Mastering Bond Trading in 2024: A Comprehensive Guide
Mastering Bond Trading in 2024: A Comprehensive Guide

Bonds, often referred to as fixed income securities, continue to play a pivotal role in the financial landscape, serving as a fundamental instrument for governments and corporations to raise capital for various ventures...

Deciphering Crypto Lending: A Comprehensive Guide to the Process and Pros & Cons
Deciphering Crypto Lending: A Comprehensive Guide to the Process and Pros & Cons

While many cryptocurrency enthusiasts aim to profit from buying, holding, and selling digital assets, a growing number of individuals are discovering an alternative path to leverage their crypto holdings...

Maximizing Financial Gains with USDC: An In-Depth Guide to Earning Interest
Maximizing Financial Gains with USDC: An In-Depth Guide to Earning Interest

In an era where traditional banking yields are diminishing, the allure of earning interest through cryptocurrencies, particularly stablecoins like USD Coin (USDC), has gained immense popularity...

Maximizing Returns with USDT Staking: A Comprehensive Guide
Maximizing Returns with USDT Staking: A Comprehensive Guide

In the dynamic world of cryptocurrency, staking has emerged as a popular way to earn passive income. Among the various digital currencies available for staking...

The Modern Day Trader's Guide: Understanding Time Commitment and Strategies in 2024
The Modern Day Trader's Guide: Understanding Time Commitment and Strategies in 2024

As the curtain closes on 2023, with the S&P 500 signaling a moderate gain, the focus shifts to the landscape of day trading in 2024. Day trading, a practice where traders capitalize on intraday...

Unlocking Opportunities in Global Commodity Markets with FXTM’s Advanced CFD Trading
Unlocking Opportunities in Global Commodity Markets with FXTM’s Advanced CFD Trading

Step into the world of global commodities trading with FXTM, where we offer a gateway to diverse investment opportunities through advanced CFD trading. Experience the flexibility and potential of trading...


Editors' Picks

The Top Forex Expert Advisors 2024: Performance, Strategy, and Reliability Review

An annual roundup reviewing the most successful Forex Expert Advisors (EAs) based on their performance, strategies employed, reliability, and user feedback. This piece would provide insights into which EAs have been market leaders and why.

The Evolution of Forex Expert Advisors: Navigating the Path of Technological Revolution

The concept of automated trading has been around for decades, but the accessibility and sophistication of Forex EAs have seen significant advancements in the past few years. Initially, automated trading systems were rudimentary, focusing on simple indicators like moving averages.

The Impact of EAs on Forex Trading: A Double-Edged Sword

By enabling continuous, algorithm-based trading, EAs contribute to the efficiency of the Forex market. They can instantly react to market movements and news events, providing liquidity and stabilizing currency prices through their high-volume trading activities.

MultiBank Group information and reviews
MultiBank Group
84%
XM information and reviews
XM
82%
FP Markets information and reviews
FP Markets
81%
FXTM information and reviews
FXTM
80%
AMarkets information and reviews
AMarkets
79%
BlackBull information and reviews
BlackBull
78%

© 2006-2024 Forex-Ratings.com

The usage of this website constitutes acceptance of the following legal information.
Any contracts of financial instruments offered to conclude bear high risks and may result in the full loss of the deposited funds. Prior to making transactions one should get acquainted with the risks to which they relate. All the information featured on the website (reviews, brokers' news, comments, analysis, quotes, forecasts or other information materials provided by Forex Ratings, as well as information provided by the partners), including graphical information about the forex companies, brokers and dealing desks, is intended solely for informational purposes, is not a means of advertising them, and doesn't imply direct instructions for investing. Forex Ratings shall not be liable for any loss, including unlimited loss of funds, which may arise directly or indirectly from the usage of this information. The editorial staff of the website does not bear any responsibility whatsoever for the content of the comments or reviews made by the site users about the forex companies. The entire responsibility for the contents rests with the commentators. Reprint of the materials is available only with the permission of the editorial staff.
We use cookies to improve your experience and to make your stay with us more comfortable. By using Forex-Ratings.com website you agree to the cookies policy.