The algorithm of Forex inControl is so unique that the EA can easily work on many currency pairs but it is best for trading AUDUSD, EURGBP on M10 timeframe. Forex inControl is suitable for Conservative, Normal and Aggressive styles of trading. Forex inControl is a EA which can work both: as a single system on account and in a combination with any other EA. The minimum recommended deposit is $1000. The advisor's potential profitability is 890%.
It does not open orders all the time, it awaits for the best moment to enter the Market. That allows to trade with several EAs on one account at the same time without getting big drawdowns.
Backtest is the only effective method which helps to get an idea of how the EA will trade on the Market in the future. With Forex inControl we were able to make backtests for the last 15-16 years on each currency pair. This is a phenomenal result, and it confirms that our EA is really reliable and stable to all kind of news and changes on Forex.
The most important thing in Forex trading is not to lose your deposit. That is why you need a proper money management. Our EA allows to specify a maximal possible drawdown precisely, so that under any circumstances you wouldn’t lose more than expected. In the represented EA we applied a technology that automatically sets StopLoss for all orders on such a price, that will not let you lose a dollar more than it is pointed in the settings of the EA.
The algorithm of Forex inControl is so unique that the EA can easily work on many currency pairs. But we chose two best ones. Trading on two currency pairs makes it possible to cover potential losses on one pair by the profit from trading on the other one. Such diversification allows to get a stable profit.
Trading on two currency pairs with a possibility to limit a drawdown separately on each of them, gives a great opportunity to diversify your profit and risks. That will allow you to get a stable profit at minimal risks.
|Forex inControl EA Rating||6.4|
|Yield per annum||894%|
|Max drawdown per annum||10.73%|
|Type||trend, grid, hedge|
|Lot size||not less than 1000 units per 0.1 of a standard lot|
|Trading tool/currency pairs||AUDUSD, EURGBP|
|Automatic account type|
|Max risk limitation|
|Several one-way series|
|Auto start lot|
|Fixed stop loss|
|Automatic lapse expansions|
|3||FX Classic Trader||335%|
|13||WallStreet Evolution 2.0||85.3%|
|14||Yeti Forex Robot||14%|
|15||Happy Market Hours||87.62%|
|1||Metatrader 5 Trading Platform|
|2||MetaTrader 4 Trading Platform|
|3||cTrader Trading Platform|
|5||MetaTrader 5 Mobile Trading Platform|
|6||MetaTrader 4 Mobile Trading Platform|
|8||ZuluTrade Trading Platform|
RatingsForex Brokers Expert Advisors Trading Platforms Cryptocurrencies
Forex BrokersReviews & Comments Low Spread Brokers MT5 Brokers MT4 Brokers Bitcoin Brokers PayPal Brokers Scalping Brokers Best Forex Brokers Top Forex Brokers Compare Brokers How to Choose Open Forex Account
© 2006-2021 Forex-Ratings.com
The usage of this website constitutes acceptance of the following legal information.
Any contracts of financial instruments offered to conclude bear high risks and may result in the full loss of the deposited funds. Prior to making transactions one should get acquainted with the risks to which they relate. All the information featured on the website (reviews, brokers' news, comments, analysis, quotes, forecasts or other information materials provided by Forex Ratings, as well as information provided by the partners), including graphical information about the forex companies, brokers and dealing desks, is intended solely for informational purposes, is not a means of advertising them, and doesn't imply direct instructions for investing. Forex Ratings shall not be liable for any loss, including unlimited loss of funds, which may arise directly or indirectly from the usage of this information. The editorial staff of the website does not bear any responsibility whatsoever for the content of the comments or reviews made by the site users about the forex companies. The entire responsibility for the contents rests with the commentators. Reprint of the materials is available only with the permission of the editorial staff.