ECN forex brokers are species of investment and online trading offering companies. Their distinction from regular forex brokers is figured out in cooperation with institutional liquidity providers to let retail customers the direct access to them; such brokerages provide a possibility of trading currencies without the participation of a dealing center. ECN broker provides a trader with access to various financial institutions and banks, as these technologies are embedded into the network of electronic communications of a dealing desk. ECN technologies are elaborated and sophisticated to ensure high internal liquidity, possibility of closing deals, internal rates' clearance. ECN forex brokers do charge commission for making deals, at that they offer certain advantages to their clients, such as no "chasing stops" and anti-scalping. The ecn brokers in the international currency markets are not excessively numerous and dominating, but there is the sufficient enough amount of them to offer a decent variety of possibilities. Our rating is proud to present to the international traders’ community a selection of ECN companies and top ecn brokers where any interested trader may well find a reliable ECN broker. Read our article "What is ECN?" to find out what opportunities ECN brokers provide their clients. ECN forex broker comparison tool provided by our rating is intended to help you to choose the best best ecn broker ever to trade with. ECN broker list grows perpetually as long as more and more brokerages start offering direct trading services to their customers. The reviews from real traders you can find at our forum will assist you to select best ecn brokers from the variety of those.
|#||Forex Broker||ECN account size||Year||Status||Regulation||Reviews|
|1||FXTM||$500||2011||Recommended||CySEC, FCA, IFSC||Reviews|
|3||MultiBank Group||$5 000||2005||ASIC, BAFIN, CIMA, ESCA, FSC, MAS, FMA, TFG, HKCE, AUSTRAC, VFSC||Reviews|
|4||FP Markets||$100||2005||ASIC, CySEC, FSCA||Reviews|
|5||Exness||$||2008||FSA, CySEC , FCA , FSCA , CBCS ,FSC, FSC (Mauritius)||Reviews|
|8||LBLV||$1 000||2018||Seychelles FSA||Reviews|
|11||eToro||$50||2007||NFA, CySEC, ASIC, CFTC, MiFID, FCA||Reviews|
|13||Saxo Bank||$1 000||1992||FSA||Reviews|
|15||FXOpen||$100||2003||FCA, ASIC, FC||Reviews|
|18||NPBFX||$100||1996||IFSC, Financial Commission||Reviews|
|19||Tickmill||$100||2014||FCA UK, CySEC, FSA Seychelles||Reviews|
* Forex Rating accepts no liability for any errors in the information, trading conditions and Forex Reviews of the ECN Forex Brokers. For the most recent information please visit the Forex Broker's site.
|5||1000pip Climber System||77.3%|
|7||Odin Forex Robot||57%|
|12||GPS Forex Robot||345%|
|1||Metatrader 5 Trading Platform|
|2||Atompix Trading Platform|
|3||MetaTrader 4 Trading Platform|
|4||cTrader Trading Platform|
|6||MetaTrader 5 Mobile Trading Platform|
|7||MetaTrader 4 Mobile Trading Platform|
|9||ZuluTrade Trading Platform|
© 2006-2023 Forex-Ratings.com
The usage of this website constitutes acceptance of the following legal information.
Any contracts of financial instruments offered to conclude bear high risks and may result in the full loss of the deposited funds. Prior to making transactions one should get acquainted with the risks to which they relate. All the information featured on the website (reviews, brokers' news, comments, analysis, quotes, forecasts or other information materials provided by Forex Ratings, as well as information provided by the partners), including graphical information about the forex companies, brokers and dealing desks, is intended solely for informational purposes, is not a means of advertising them, and doesn't imply direct instructions for investing. Forex Ratings shall not be liable for any loss, including unlimited loss of funds, which may arise directly or indirectly from the usage of this information. The editorial staff of the website does not bear any responsibility whatsoever for the content of the comments or reviews made by the site users about the forex companies. The entire responsibility for the contents rests with the commentators. Reprint of the materials is available only with the permission of the editorial staff.